Sports Financial Executives

Photo Albums

No album created yet.

Videos

RationalFX Founder Agrawal Plans Expansion Into Europe 03:40
108 views
2011-11-23 08:08:01
Rajesh Agrawal of RationalFX for iSportconnect 08:02
137 views
2011-10-15 11:39:47
Financial Management in the Sport Industry 02:30
100 views
2011-09-28 23:35:48

Powered By: logo

Richard_ScudamorePremier League Clubs today agreed in principle to a system of enhanced financial regulations, which are designed to further improve the sustainability of clubs.

The Premier League Financial Regulation includes a sustainability clause that will require clubs to work towards break-even, while allowing a degree of owner investment going in as equity. A short-term cost control protocol was also agreed, which would limit the amount clubs could raise their player costs by above an agreed floor from centrally distributed revenue.

From the 2013/14 season Premier League clubs cannot make a loss in excess of £105m aggregated across seasons 2013/14, 2014/15 and 2015/16.

If the rules are broken the Premier League will not be afraid to offer up a points deduction as punishment.

Richard Scudamore, Premier League Chief Executive, said: "As all things in our rulebook you will subject to a disciplinary commission.

"The clubs understand that if people break the £105m we will look for the top-end ultimate sanction range - a points deduction.

"Normally we stay silent on sanctions as the commission has a free range but clearly if there is a material breach of that rule we will be asking the commission to consider top-end sanctions."

Scudamore said that the measures would mean it will take longer for benefactor owners to achieve success, but that it would still be possible.

He said: "The balance we have tried to strike is that a new owner can still invest a decent amount of money to improve their club but they are not going to be throwing hundreds and hundreds of millions in a very short period of time.

"While it has worked for a couple of clubs in the last 10 years, and I am not critical of that, if that's going to be done in the future it's going to have to be over a slightly longer term without the huge losses being made.

"I think at £105m you can still build a very decent club with substantial owner funding but you have to do it over time, you can't do it in a season."

Lorient to Host Penultimate Stopover for 2014-15 Volvo Ocean Race

04-09-2013 03:04 pm

volvo

Volvo Ocean Race have announced the French city of Lorient will return as the penultimate stopover in the Volvo Ocean Race for the 12th edition in 2014-15.

The route will take in 10 cities in nine countries – Spain, Brazil, United Arab Emirates, China, New Zealand, United States, Portugal, France and Sweden – and will require the teams to cover 39,895 nautical miles – equivalent to 45,910 miles or 73,886 kilometers.

The Race will start on October 4, 2014, day of the first In-Port Race in Alicante, and finish with a final In-Port Race on June 27, 2015 in Gothenburg, the Swedish home of Volvo.

“This route has never really been part of any ocean race any time before,” said Volvo Ocean Race CEO Knut Frostad. “And when you have that element there’s a new strategy, there’s a new route, there’s new weather, there’s new challenges for the sailors. That is exciting, not only for us but for the sailors because no-one can claim they’ve done this before.”

Lorient, the Breton city on the west coast of France, hosted the Race for the first time in 2011-12 and provided an incredible spectacle for fans.

"Lorient is France's sailing capital and the response we had during the last Race was phenomenal," said Race CEO Frostad. "It will be a real pleasure to come back to this stunning part of the world, where the people are so knowledgeable about the sport and the whole set-up suits the Race so perfectly. Lorient will be a real highlight on the route."

Sorry! Not currently available
Sorry! Not currently available

iSportconnect sub community for sports CFOs and Financial Directors to share & learn from one another. We would also organise events for the members on a regular basis.

Discussions

The short answer is that it's complicated. It is important to remember that the break-even requirement doesn't come into force until the 2013/14 season and that even when this comes into play, there are acceptable deviations allowed and certain income/expenditure that will not be included in the calculation. For example, the wages of any player signed prior to when the FFPR came into force (1 June 2010) will not be included. This means that Adebayor's wages will not be included for Man City. Infrastructure development, youth development, community work, non-football operations not related to the club and tax income/expenditure will not be included. For 2013/14, the 'acceptable deviation' will be €45m, meaning that a club can report a €45m loss and still be within the FFPR. Related-party transactions must be included in the calculations, however it is likely that Man City's Etihad deal will not quality as a 'related party' transaction. However, even if it does qualify, Man City may be able to get away with it, as it is up to a club to demonstrate that a 'related party' transaction represents 'fair value'. UEFA has limited powers to question a club's estimation of 'fair value' under the FFPR. I hope that this helps and, also, that you are not a Manchester City fan - I didn't mean to pick on them. You could easily swap their name with Chelsea…
Last replied by Andy Brown on Thursday, 12 July 2012
Hi All, the Dutch are ahead. They exempt income from sportsmen derived in connection with the performance on the Dutch territory. The justify this measure by arguing that it boosts semplicity (it avoids complex methods of collecting taxes upon foreign athletes) , at least this is the "public" goal of the exemption.....
Last replied by Mario Tenore (Fiscalista) on Saturday, 26 May 2012
I've published a specific analysis on the matter, but it's only in Italian. However numbers are international !!! You find it here: http://tifosobilanciato.it/2012/03/21/i-nuovi-criteri-di-ripartizione-dei-diritti-tv-in-serie-a/ At pages 4-6 you can find the detail on how the resources are distributed, both with numbers and graphs. Page 10 makes a simulation on how the 2012/2013 amount increase would have affected the current Serie A structure. Have a good day.
Last replied by Diego Tari on Wednesday, 16 May 2012
Well, if we look at the UEFA info, apart from Bundesliga teams I really don't know how many clubs in Europe are really ready for FFP ... Serie A problems are quite commons: clubs rely too much on broadcasting revenues (more or less 50% of the total turnover) and have lower matchday revenues compared to other Countries. And those teams who do not qualify for Champions League (because EL is by far giving less money) experience difficulties in managing players' salaries. On the other end, I'm not so sure that the proporty stadium model would be a success also in Italy, mainly for cultural reasons. Juventus Stadium is a particular situation, because the stadium is in Torino but supporters are widespread all over the country: therefore is easier for the team to have the fully booked stadium every match, since more than 50% of the seats are bought by supporter clubs coming from outside the city and may organize 1 match per year for their affiliate. I any case action have been taken (mainly on the cost side, trying to reduce the average player cost) We will discover soon the reality ....
Last replied by Diego Tari on Tuesday, 15 May 2012
I agree with Colin in thinking that it's not the public's right to know. Why should players salaries be announced to the public? Everyone knows they are earning vast amounts of money every week so i don't think the significance of this would be too great. Like Ed mentioned though, the benefits from a business point of view aren't very apparent. I certainly couldn't imagine a footballer's parent club being very pleased with public knowledge into the contracts they pay whereas it would offer rival club's inside knowledge into planning for player transfers. An interesting topic!
Last replied by Marc Sibbons on Wednesday, 02 May 2012
I'm not an EU Law expert, I've a basic knowledge coming from the University studies. I think, however, that in order to establish a real "unfair aid" it is necessary to demonstrate an active behaviour coming from a Country rather than a too weak control activity. Spain could answer, for example, that the fiscal debt was regularly sactioned with fines ans interests. What astonishes me even more, however, is the fact that this Euro 750 million debt (that has been now negotiated) came out in a Country that until 2010 has allowed the same football clubs to have a favourable taxation regime on the players' salaries. Spain, in fact, has extended for a long time (I would say since 2002, but i'm not sure) to football players the EU law on "brain incentive", the same that was studied to ease the possibility, ie for scientific researchers, to come back to Europe. The same law highly reduced, for the first 4 years, the impact of social security and taxation on the players' salaries which according to UEFA study in 2009/2010 in average represented 60% of all costs. It's the combination of the two effectes which is unbelievable: they already had a far lower taxation compared to other EU companies and they still accumulate a so huge debt.
Last replied by Diego Tari on Friday, 27 April 2012
I opened a new discussion here http://www.isportconnect.com/index.php?option=com_community&view=groups&task=viewdiscussion&topicid=705&groupid=92&Itemid=7 Diego
Last replied by Diego Tari on Thursday, 05 April 2012