Windsurfing out, Sailing next?

Discussion started by Edward Rangsi , on Tuesday, 15 May 2012 10:27

As many (including myself) struggle to comprehend the reasoning behind the decision to remove windsurfing as an Olympic discipline. It has been reported that pressure from the International Olympic Committee is the reason for ISAF’s unpopular choice, as they demand that all sports have to be commercially viable.

Former Olympian Neil Pryde recently stated that: 'The main source of revenue for the IOC is from television and as far as sailing is concerned, it scores poorly in TV ratings

'On top of this, the IOC is also against sports which are regarded as elitist. They want sports for the people. Unfortunately sailing is regarded as elitist, the 'yacht class'.'

I remember a chat I had with Mark Turner a few months ago and he brought up the possibility of sailing no longer being at the Games. He stated: “While what happens in the Olympics is very good for sailing, ultimately it doesn’t change, it doesn’t evolve and it doesn’t become more entertaining. The reality is Olympic sailing will bit-by-bit be reduced in its scale and perhaps, at some point, disappear completely.”

http://www.isportconnect.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=10593&Itemid=314

Firstly, what do you make of the windsurfing decision? Is kiteboarding really more commercially viable than windsurfing? What’s next for the sport?

Secondly, I don’t want to be pessimistic, but there is the possibility of sailing being next out the door. Thoughts...

Latest Discussion
Clifford Webb
Interesting comments from everyone, and I am very much in tune with Dawn in lamenting the removal of women’s match racing from the Olympics – if it was my call I’d have added men’s in too! The decision over Kite V Windsurf is a bitter blow for the windsurfing industry after almost 30 years as an Olympic discipline, and has the possibility of destroying businesses and careers. There is a campaign under way to have this ISAF decision reversed which is growing in momentum. Even the Kiteboarders were astonished that their lobby to become an Olympic discipline succeeded in time to be implemented ahead of Brazil, as there are many aspects of integrating it that are still to be determined, and it was anticipated it may first be included in 2020. It will be interesting to see if the decision is latterly overturned.

Kiteboarding has exploded in popularity in recent years with an 'extreme' and exciting image, and with the likes of Richard Branson publicly advocating the sport and becoming a leading ambassador for it, however, windsurfing's enduring popularity, comparative safety and relative ease of learning for all ages compared to kiteboarding, has seen its participation levels continue over many years. Combined with its status as an Olympic discipline, this enabled NGB's to invest in training programmes and build an expertise, creating a very high level of competition that feeds right back to the grass roots in most developed countries, supporting millions of people globally.

Both sports can be amazingly exciting - I have directed many hours of both of them over the years, but as Vince says earlier, one issue with a tight shot of kites is that all you see is a person magically standing on a board holding 2 bits of rope! Sure surfers have the same kind of shot, but they have a wave as a background - whereas in slalom kiting, the shots are limited. Freestyle is far more exciting from my perspective as Alexandre says.

There have been rumblings about the future of sailing in the Olympics generally for a long time now as Ed states in his opening comments. It's not easy to televise and make both understandable and entertaining, (though this year's Olympic coverage may prove to be the best yet), is affected by the prevailing weather conditions (as are other Olympic sports), but is considered hard to 'pin' into a stadium environment where the public can see clearly what is going on and understand the rules. Weymouth this year has evidently sold most of the tickets for all events, and specially built grandstands will be full. The organisers are going to great lengths to make this an enjoyable experience for fans (and Britain is holding its breath for more Gold), so it will be interesting to see if Rob Andrews and his team there set a new benchmark in appreciation for what is possible, and potentially alter the perceptions of sailing in the Olympics. No pressure there then!

One could ask, (I don't know but I am sure will be put right!), how many archers compete in the world, or indeed professionally, compared to a sport as large and commercial as sailing, if comparisons are asked for? Is it exciting to watch? Is it considered elitist? What about shooting - is there a more elitist sport with its image of tweeds and flat caps? Is it exciting and entertaining to watch, and are there millions of participants every weekend worldwide?

Sailing does suffer image problems, but losing all those medal opportunities from the Games and the infrastructure behind it is quite a step for the IOC. Not impossible, especially in the face of potentially diminishing budgets in future years, but there would be outrage globally if sailing were removed, let alone windsurfing as we have seen. On their website the IOC states: ‘To make it onto the Olympic programme, a sport first has to be recognised: it must be administered by an International Federation which ensures that the sport's activities follow the Olympic Charter. If it is widely practised around the world and meets a number of criteria established by the IOC session, a recognised sport may be added to the Olympic programme on the recommendation of the IOC's Olympic Programme Commission’. Further, there is a long list of additional criteria that is then considered, and sailing certainly ticks all of them pretty well, as does windsurfing, but many people are finding it hard to say the same about Kiteboarding.

According to some insiders involved at ISAF, there was confusion about which nation would vote for which discipline, and some people appear to have changed their mind at the last moment, tipping the balance by a small majority to kites. The question being asked now is, was this a personal decision, or was it made for the best interest of that nation’s sporting interests? The former is widely suspected, and the pressure, and that lobby to have this overturned next November at the next ISAF session is mounting steadily.

Interesting times indeed, and almost 3 week’s worth of medals up for grabs in between then and now....

347 days ago
 
Chuck Lantz
Replacing other sailing sports with kite-sailing is very puzzling to me. Maybe the kite-surfers have a stronger lobbying group? I live about five minutes from a very popular kite-sailing and board sailing area on San Francisco bay, and of all the sailing sports I photograph, kite-sailing is by far the most difficult to shoot successfully.

Since the kite is about 50 feet away from the kite-surfer, getting both into a single shot can only be done at wide-angle. The only time both the kite and the surfer are in the same smaller frame is when the surfer screws up and the kite drops towards the water. How this will be handled for television is beyond me, since only very wide shots will make any sense to the viewer.

And even then, the control interplay between the surfer and his or her kite is so very subtle that even a close shot of the surfer won't tell the viewer very much at all about what's going on. All things considered, it seems that the kite-sailing decision is a step even farther away from the announced goal of the ISAF and IOC, which is to add more clarity for the TV viewer for sailing events.
368 days ago
 
Alexandre Neves Almeida
Great discussion, guys! Very good points here. I believe Sailing is a bit lost in time. As Sally mentioned, Cricket with its Twenty20 as well as Rugby with its Rugby Sevens are excellent examples of how sports should adapt to new realities. We all know how important TV revenues are for sports, and although we still have examples of sports which are not that exciting in the Olympics, the sports that adapt are much more likely to survive. It´s obvious. And it´s also obvious that this is not happening with Sailing.

We still see the same race courses being used, which are boring and hard to understand for spectators, even those who are into Sailing. Thus, I believe the main point is that Sailing needs a breakthrough, maybe by concentrating on Catamarans and their speed, or by changing completely the courses and the way the competitions are done. Spectators need dynamic races, need to understand who´s first, where the boats are going and what strategy they are using. Without that, there will be no spectators and, therefore, no TV.

I don´t agree either with women´s match racing being removed, as Match Racing is itself a step to make the sport of sailing more TV friendly. That´s why it´s complicated to understand what ISAF is up to, when it comes to TV issues. Thus, I don´t think Kitesurfing would be a step on this way, as kitesurfing races are far less exciting than Free Style (which is actually the most popular category) and don´t seem to be more exciting than Windsurfing.

I believe that having Kitesurfing in the Olympics can be a strategic step for ISAF, as it will officially embrace kitesurfers and a huge number of athletes all over the world that are IOC´s main target: the youth. I´ve said "can be a strategic step" because it´s still unclear what ISAF is willing to do. At the end of the day, we will at least see ISAF taking a next step, but if the Kitesurfing races are not well planned, being boring and hard to understand, the problem will remain.

368 days ago
 
Donald Lawson
As I am writing this, I have to agree first with what Dawn Riley said above. The obvious thing people who don't know sailing have been telling me is it looks like ISAF is not servicing the sailing community, it is serving itself. Logic is not on the side for the weight range that is allowed to race in the olympics. Logic is not on the side of removing a strong event like windsurfing especially when you need to keep kids and extreme athletes interested. I saw the 470 and Finn are still in the olympics, so age of boats is not a reason to get rid of boats. Honestly, as a sailor, I am not excited about the Olympics for sailing. I don't know many sailors who are. And if sailors don't care, its hard to get non-sailors to care. When ISAF removed the catamaran from London, I knew then, the direction Olympic sailing was going wasn't good and it would be hard to gain trust from sailors. To remove the top media platform from the 2008 Olympic in sailing right after the media tells you we love the catamarans, shows that ISAF mindset is not on building the sport. If the media wants it, you don't take it away, you give them more. You format the race course to what the media wants, you give them the motivation to follow your sport. I bet if you ask the average sailor from most countries who are their olympic sailors are, they wouldn't know. So obviously, the media or mainstream doesn't know. If you want to build the sport, findout what they want (fast boats) and give them alot of it. To remove windsurfing, defeats that.
370 days ago
 
Dawn Riley
As I understand it, we might be done with the decision process but MAYBE this will force the collective sailing world to take notice (and for many countries the government and ministers). The ISAF is quite dysfunctional in making strategic decisions and it is also a bit like they are chasing squirrels. Are we supposed to be more TV friendly? Why the heck did match racing get pushed out? I predict that this will be the MOST TV friendly of all of the events? Are we supposed to be creating boats for small people? What about the big strong athletes? Are we modifying for the small and emerging countries to the detriment of countries with many dedicated athletes or visa versa?
370 days ago
 
Chuck Lantz
I'm torn on this one. Both sailing and the Olympics are near and dear to me, but if I'd have to choose which of the two I would want to see survive and thrive, it would have to be the Olympics, specifically since the stated goal of the IOC is to involve sports that are far more inclusive than sailing.

Since the commercial viability of each potential and actual Olympic sport has, out of financial necessity, become a more important consideration for that sports inclusion in the Games, dropping wind-surfing, and possibly even sailing, does make sense. Cold-blooded sense, but sense nonetheless. Factor-in the difficulty in presenting wind-surfing and other sailing events to a TV audience, plus the logistics problems involved with finding a suitable venue for sailing at each Olympic site, and sailing becomes an easy target for exclusion when the beans are being counted.

Looking at the situation from the competitive sailor and sailing fans point of view, how truly important are the Olympics for sailing? In most other sports categories, an Olympic medal is the ultimate award, but can the same be said of sailing? Would a winner of the Star Worlds trade their gold star for an Olympic gold medal?

Then there's the problem of the "elitism" charge. Sailing is expensive, and to some extent, exclusive. But if that charge is valid, why drop sail-boarding, the least expensive and most inclusive of the sailing categories?

No matter what the actual reasons behind dropping the sailing events, the IOC's decisions will always leave us scratching our heads as long as synchronized swimming is still an Olympic event.

371 days ago
 
Vincent Casalaina
I know that sailing is an expensive sport for the Olympics to cover and a very expensive venue given the number of competitors served and that ISAF needed to make the sailing more exciting - ie attract a bigger audience. If we don't attract a bigger audience, sailing will likely go away as an Olympic sport because of the cost.

One of the other complaints ISAF has needed to deal with has been the insular nature of sailing. Sailing has one of the lowest number of countries that participate in it of any Olympic competition. Getting rid of small inexpensive classes where potentially many countries can enter athletes seems counter productive.

That said, I have been appalled by ISAF's decisions regarding which Olympic classes are to remain and which are to go for some time now. It feels like they are grasping at straws rather than finding a coherent strategy for expanding the sport and its draw.

I thought that the elimination of women's match racing before the women had ever had the opportunity to appear in the games and show whether they could generate interest and audience was a terrible decision. They'll get their one shot in 2012 and then be gone.

I thought the elimination of the Star in favor of the Finn was a terrible decision too. The Star was the largest boat with the largest crew while the Finn was one of a number of dinghies and other than crew weight hardly different than the Laser. If ISAF was going to keep the Finn then they should in my opinion have dropped the Laser - or vice versa. If ISAF thought the Star was old and not interesting, they could have dropped it and replaced it with a newer more exciting keel boat.

I don't have a strong opinion about the windsurfer vs kiteboard controversy. I think kiteboarding has potential to be a strong Olympic class because it is a strong visual class which plays well on TV. They need long courses and as a cameraman they are hard to follow around the course because of their speed. I think that windsurfers have shown that they can have exciting racing on shorter courses which is an advantage but they too are hard to shoot because of their speed. Neither can have on board cameras transmitting live so that we can follow their action up close.

I'm excited that there will be catamaran sailing in 2016. I think that the success of the Extreme Sailing series and the growth of the America's Cup World Series offers a lot of potential to make this class successful on all the fronts needed to keep sailing in the Olympics.
371 days ago
 
Sally Kettle
I think this is an interesting dilemma where the question of whether a sport is elitist or not is a bit of a distraction. One might say rowing is an elitist sport, yet through the gold medal winning efforts of our privately educated teams, the sport has grown from strength to strength. This increase in exposure has given a broader spectrum of the community an opportunity to participate, inspired by these Olympic wins.

So whether windsurfing, sailing or any other sport is elitist or not is not really the issue. The issue is accessibility. If the Olympics is a showcase for sporting achievement but no one is watching it, due to the rigours of broadcast or the the fact that on screen or out in the field it's just down right dull, then perhaps it is time to move on? Wind surfing being a obvious victim.

Much like the monumental adjustments implemented by the ECB with the introduction of Twenty20 cricket, it's surely up to the playmakers to find ways of engaging the public? It's change or die.... Nobody likes it, but no sport can thrive without competitors. If the Olympics is an opportunity to inspire a new generation then there's a responsibility to ensure it's more engaging.
371 days ago